विवेचन सारांश
Arjuna's Bewilderment on seeing the Supreme Cosmic Form
वामांगे गिरीराज राजतनया जाया भवानी स्थिताः।
नन्दी स्कन्ध गणाधिनाथ सहितः केदारनाथ प्रभु
केदारांचल संस्थितो हि सततं कुर्यात् सदा मंगलम्।।
Mahashivratri is a festival to remember and to take our awareness to the basis of our existence: Shiva! It is also a Divine providence, that we are learning about HIS Vishvaroop, HIS cosmic form on this auspicious occasion.
There are 12 Shivratris that happen in a year, it increases to 13 if there is an additional month for leap years. Shivratri occurs on Krishna Paksha Chaturdashi of every month. However, there are 2 occasions that are considered the most important ones Krishna Paksha Chaturdashi (14th day) during Phalguna (12th month) which is the MahaShivratri and the one during the month of Shravana. Similarly, as per Amanta calendar Maha Shivaratri is observed on Krishna Paksha Chaturdashi (14th day) during Magha (11th month).
It should be noted that in both calendars the day of Maha Shivaratri is observed on the same day. It is the nomenclature of lunar months which differs in both calendar...
There are various legends as to why the Maha Shivaratri is celebrated and considered the most important ones.
The most popular of them is that Bhagavān Shiva married Ma Parvati on this day. So, it is a celebration of this sacred union.
However, as a Sadhaka there is another important event that took place this day. It is said that on this day, Bhagavān Shankar became Shiva! And appeared in the form of a Lingodhbhav Vigraha at midnight.
But what is the significance of this event? Isn’t Bhagavān Shankar the same as Shiva? Isn’t HE the Rudra?
But why then we don’t call Maha Shivaratri after them? Why not Shankar Ratri, or Rudra ratri? Why Shiva? Are they different?
सदावसन्तं हृदयारविन्दे, भवं भवानीसहितं नमामि ॥
A beautiful Bhajan depicting Bhagavan Shiv ji's benevolence was shared:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1G82neRleKYp2K0NI5XhcavU-Oshb8Kuv/view?usp=drivesdk
11.15
arjuna uvāca
paśyāmi devāṃstava deva dehe,
sarvāṃstathā bhūtaviśeṣasaṅghān,
brahmāṇamīśaṃ(ṅ) kamalāsanastham,
ṛṣīṃśca sarvānuragāṃśca divyān. 11.15
Arjun is very amazed. Here one can notice the big difference between Arjuna and a normal human being. About Swargalok, our knowledge is limited to the extent of what we have read in scriptures or what we have heard from others. Arjuna on the other hand is having experience of living in Swargalok. He lived there for one year for procuring Divine weapons and had interacted with the Devas. And now he says he is seeing them all in HIM.
Arjuna is seeing the Devalok, Brahma Lok and Kailash in Bhagavan's Cosmic form. Here is another concept, the saints say that it is a matter of a Samaṣṭi Brahma. Similarly there is a Vyashti Brahma, Vyashti Shiva and Vyashti Vishnu within every individual.
When one has children while speaking to others one says; I have given birth to two boys. Now is this Brahma ji's creation or the mortal being who is claiming it to be his creation? One becomes Bhagavan Vishnu to when one says he is rising the kids. In saying "have been running a factory which caters to around 1300 employees" one becomes Vishnu the Nurturer. Here one would not find any inconsistency in becoming Brahma or Vishnu.
But, in the event of a fire in the factory one does not say I am Shiva and I own up the loss due to my shortcomings; or in the event of a death in the family we do not say I killed the person. We become Brahma the Creator, Vishnu the Nurturer but never do we become or declare to be Shiva in the event of a death. When something goes amiss we never own it up. When something goes wrong we instantly blame HIM and even audaciously say; job done by me was perfect yet why did it go wrong. Conveniently we blame HIM for everything that goes wrong. We pride in becoming Brahma, Vishnu but never do we think of becoming Shiva. The crux of the problem lies in this. One needs to learn becoming Shiva too. If becoming Shiva is undesirable or not possible then one has to stop considering to be Brahma or Vishnu. It has to be either the three or do not consider to be the origin of all the three.
Vedanta defines different kinds of Space;
Ghaṭākāśa - the inside of a container or a vessel, the inner space of the body; MAHAKASH - the space of the universe and CHIDAKASH - the space of consciousness, inner space. Many a times we keep on becoming Brahma or Vishnu indulging ourselves in joy and sorrow in this inner space of consciousness. The day one learns to bring in the absoluteness of Shiv into this inner consciousness all the turmoils of the illusions would come to an end.
Example:
Once a friend asked another friend of his as to how was his factory running? The friend replied he had shut it down long ago? Then his friend asked further, as to what was he doing at present? the reply was, he was looking after his wife's factory. The friend asked as to what factory did his wife own. Pat came the reply a factory of woes which all day along he indulges in hearing them.
We have so indulgingly created these factories of woes, that even a child owns one such factory where he pours out as to how his parents listen to whatever the elder brother says and never bother to hear him. We have become so adept at creating such factories of woes that we indulge our entire life in its processing. This is our own making where we are the Creator (Brahma) and the Nurturer (Vishnu). The day we learn to become the Shiva (annihilator) into the inner consciousness into our self created factory of woes the annihilation would happen by us. This is Śivatva - state of eternal joy, harmony..
anekabāhūdaraVāktranetraṃ(m),
paśyāmi tvāṃ(m) sarvato'nantarūpam,
nāntaṃ(n) na madhyaṃ(n) na punastavādiṃ(m),
paśyāmi viśveśvara viśvarūpa. 11.16
Not all may know it but the Cosmic form that Bhagavan has shown in Gita is also shown in Ramacharitmanas.
Bhagavan Rama's mother Kausalya ji nurtured HIM as all the mothers do. She bathed and fed him like any mother does.
निज कुल इष्टदेव भगवाना। पूजा हेतु कीन्ह अस्नाना॥1॥
करि पूजा नैबेद्य चढ़ावा। आपु गई जहँ पाक बनावा॥
बहुरि मातु तहवाँ चलि आई। भोजन करत देख सुत जाई॥2
गै जननी सिसु पहिं भयभीता। देखा बाल तहाँ पुनि सूता॥
बहुरि आइ देखा सुत सोई। हृदयँ कंप मन धीर न होई॥3॥
इहाँ उहाँ दुइ बालक देखा। मतिभ्रम मोर कि आन बिसेषा॥
देखि राम जननी अकुलानी। प्रभु हँसि दीन्ह मधुर मुसुकानी॥4॥
तन पुलकित मुख बचन न आवा। नयन मूदि चरननि सिरु नावा॥
बिसमयवंत देखि महतारी। भए बहुरि सिसुरूप खरारी॥3॥
अस्तुति करि न जाइ भय माना। जगत पिता मैं सुत करि जाना॥
हरि जननी बहुबिधि समुझाई। यह जनि कतहुँ कहसि सुनु माई॥4॥
बार बार कौसल्या बिनय करइ कर जोरि।
अब जनि कबहूँ ब्यापै प्रभु मोहि माया तोरि॥202॥
The Lord then revealed to His mother His marvellous infinite form, every pore of whose skin contained millions of universes. (201)
She saw therein countless suns and moons. Sivas and four-faced Brahmas, and a number of mountains, river oceans, plains and woods, as well as the spirit of time, the priciple of action, the modes of Prakrti (Sattva, Rajas and Tamas) the spirit of knowledge and Nature and many more things of which she had never heard before. She further perceived Maya who is powerful in every respect, stricken with terror and standing with her palma joined toghther. The mother also beheld the embodied soul, who is made to dance by Maya, and even so the spirit of devotion, which liberates the soul. The hair on the mother's body bristled and she stood speechless. Closing her eyes she bowed her head at the Lord's feet. Seeing the mother struck with wonder the Slayer of Khara assumed the form of a child again. She was unable to utter praises and trembled at the thought that she had looked upon the Father of the universe as her own child. Sri Hari comforted His mother in many ways and said, "Listen, My mother: do not reveal this fact anywhere.
While reading in the Ramayana one wonders when Bhagavan Rama went into exile, the mother did not stop him; this is so because the mother had seen the real identity of Bhagavan as a child, that He is the Supreme Person. Neither Sita ji was stopped nor Laxman was stopped. Didn't say anything bad to Kaikeyi either. Otherwise, the general belief remains that Kaushalya should have created a ruckus when her son went to forest because of her step-mother, but all this did not happen.
Kaushalya ji knew everything because Bhagavan had removed the cover of his illusion from his mother. Mother vowed HIM that, she will not become an obstacle in HIS Divine Play, HE may do whatever HE has to. She will be present in the same spirit as HIS wish. Bhagavan Krishna further tells Arjuna that HE had not shown such a Cosmic form to anyone before.
kirīṭinaṃ(ṅ) gadinaṃ(ñ) cakriṇaṃ(ñ) ca,
tejorāśiṃ(m) sarvato dīptimantam,
paśyāmi tvāṃ(n) durnirīkṣyaṃ(m) ṣamantād-
dīptānalārkadyutimaprameyam. 11.17
Arjun is saying, 'aprameyam' which means incomprehensible.
The following six pramana are said to be the only reliable and accurate means of knowledge available to us.
1. Pratyaksha (Perception)Split into two types, internal and external, pratyaksha refers to acquiring knowledge based on direct experience.
It is important that knowledge acquired through pratyaksha is from your own perception, not having accepted someone else’s.
External pratyaksha involves using the five senses, whereas internal pratyaksha relies on intuition and cognition of remembered feelings such as pain, love, danger or anger.
According to Maharishi Chanavak there is direct evidence. What one sees, hears, that is the proof. What can be obtained from the five sense organs, from the work organs, from knowledge, that is the direct evidence.2. Anumana (Inference)
Anumana involves applying reason and prior knowledge to one or more observations in order to reach a new conclusion. A common example of anumana is inferring fire after observing smoke.
Then Buddhist and global texts added another evidence called inference, they felt that when the directly seen thing can also be wrong, there can be a mess in it too, then the second evidence was given inference. Guessing means following someone. Like following someone, discipline, translation, etc. For example, when one went to the terrace and saw that the entire terrace was wet he guessed that it had just rained. One did not see it raining, but by looking at the wet terrace floor, one guessed / inferred that it had rained. These are also of two types -- Answer estimation and forecasting. Seeing the clouds, it is predicted that it is going to rain heavily. Seeing the dark clouds, he predicted that it would rain. Seeing the wet roof, inferred that it had rained, this became the answer.
Upamana is a process by which conclusions are drawn from either observing similarities or understanding analogies of a similar word, object or situation.
Similes and metaphors can help us to acquire knowledge through upamana.
4. Arthapatti (Postulation)Arthapatti is presumption or supposition of a fact derived from circumstance or an already established fact. In this sense, arthapatti can be considered the junction between common sense and conjecture.
5. Anupalabdhi (Non-apprehension)Anupalabdhi is using existing knowledge of a negative as cognitive proof to derive further knowledge. By non-perception, it is possible to prove the non-existence of something.
6. Sabda (Verbal Testimony)Sabda is the relying on the spoken and written word of past or present experts. This is considered an important and authentic means of knowledge since we each have only limited time and energy available to learn truths directly.
Whatever things happen, they are based on these six pramanas only. One can observe how complete our scriptures are, whatever we consider as evidence, it must be one of these six.Arjuna is saying that HIS form is immeasurable. HIS pramana is not to be found even in these six pramanas. HIS pramana is neither direct nor inferred. It has neither its agama nor its upmana. He further says, HIS form can neither be known by means nor by absence. HE is beyond any rationale, there can be no example of this. There cannot be any proof of this, such is HIS nature.
tvamakṣaraṃ(m) paRāmaṃ(m) veditavyaṃ(n),
tvamasya viśvasya paraṃ(n) nidhānam,
tvamavyayaḥ(ś) śāśvatadharmagoptā,
sanātanastvaṃ(m) puruṣo mato me. 11.18
Anādimadhyāntamanantavīryam,
anantabāhuṃ(m) śaśisūryanetram,
paśyāmi tvāṃ(n) dīptahutāśaVāktraṃ,
svatejasā viśvamidaṃ(n) tapantam. 11.19
He further says, he is unable to understand HIM even by calculating the time. HE is eternal. That HE is endowed with infinite power. 'Ananta Bahu' - possessed of infinite arms. The sun and the moon are HIS eyes. There is so much light, radiance. HE appears with the face of blazing fire. HE has enraged the whole world with this brilliance.
A few lines of the song depicting this sentiment from the movie Bhakta Prahlad :
अपना हरि है हजार हाथ वाला।
क्या कहना समर्थ साईं का, क्या से क्या कर डाला
अपना हरि है हजार हाथ वाला।
Instead, i see You with fire burning inside your month. It's been a sur-real experience seeing You, and he says;
dyāvāpṛthivyoridamantaraṃ(m) hi,
vyāptaṃ(n) tvayaikena diśaśca sarvāḥ,
dṛṣṭvādbhutaṃ(m) rūpamugraṃ(n) tavedaṃ(m),
lokatrayaṃ(m) pravyathitaṃ(m) mahātman. 11.20
amī hi tvāṃ(m) surasaṅghā viśanti,
kecidbhītāḥ(ph) prāñjalayo gṛṇanti,
svastītyuktvā maharṣisiddhasaṅghāḥ(s),
stuvanti tvāṃ(m) stutibhiḥ(ph) puṣkalābhiḥ. 11.21
So the entire thing depends on how the other person is viewing the thing or person. (perceives).
In Vedas following is said.
यः स्मरेत्पुण्डरीकाक्षं स बाह्याभ्यन्तरः शुचिः ॥
Here the form of Bhagavan that is being viewed, is matching with how Bhagavan HIMSELF has defined HIS form in Chapter 10 (Vibhutiyoga).
rudrādityā vasavo ye ca sādhyā,
viśveśvinau marutaścoṣmapāśca,
gandharvayakṣāsurasiddhasaṅghā,
vīkṣante tvāṃ(m) vismitāścaiva sarve. 11.22
Rudra, Aditya, Vasu, Sadhyas, Visvedeva etc. all are the organs of the entire form of Bhagavan. Therefore the onlooker and also the objects to be seen - all are none else besides Bhagavan.
rūpaṃ(m) mahatte bahuVāktranetraṃ(m),
mahābāho bahubāhūrupādam,
bahūdaraṃ(m) bahudaṃṣṭrākarālaṃ(n),
dṛṣṭvā lokāḥ(ph) pravyathitāstathāham. 11.23
nabhaḥspṛśaṃ(n) dīptamanekavarṇaṃ(m),
vyāttānanaṃ(n) dīptaviśālanetram,
dṛṣṭvā hi tvāṃ(m) pravyathitāntarātmā,
dhṛtiṃ(n) na vindāmi śamaṃ(ñ) ca viṣṇo. 11.24
daṃṣṭrākarālāni ca te mukhāni,
dṛṣṭvaiva kālānalasannibhāni,
diśo na jāne na labhe ca śarma
prasīda deveśa jagannivāsa. 11.25
amī ca tvāṃ(n) dhṛtarāṣṭrasya putrāḥ(s),
sarve sahaivāvanipālasaṅghaiḥ,
bhīṣmo droṇaḥ(s) sūtaputrastathāsau,
sahāsmadīyairapi yodhamukhyaiḥ. 11.26
Vāktrāṇi te tvaramāṇā viśanti,
daṃṣṭrākarālāni bhayānakāni,
kecidvilagnā daśanāntareṣu,
sandṛśyante cūrṇitairuttamāṅgaiḥ. 11.27
Every mature person knows that sooner or later everyone has to leave this world. So you must do good deeds so that you don’t have to lament later.
yathā nadīnāṃ(m) bahavo’mbuvegāḥ(s),
samudramevābhimukhā dravanti,
tathā tavāmī naralokavīrā,
viśanti Vāktrāṇyabhivijvalanti. 11.28
yathā pradīptaṃ(ñ) jvalanaṃ(m) pataṅgā,
viśanti nāśāya samṛddhavegāḥ,
tathaiva nāśāya viśanti lokāḥ(s),
tavāpi Vāktrāṇi samṛddhavegāḥ. 11.29
lelihyase grasamānaḥ(s) ṣamantāl,
lokānṣamagrānvadanairjvaladbhiḥ,
tejobhirāpūrya jagatṣamagraṃ(m),
bhāsastavogrāḥ(ph) pratapanti viṣṇo. 11.30
ākhyāhi me ko bhavānugrarūpo
namo'stu te devavara prasīda,
vijñātumicchāmi bhavantamādyaṃ(n),
na hi prajānāmi tava pravṛttim. 11.31
Tell me who you are, so fierce in form? I bow down to you oh Supreme God, have mercy. I desire to know You, the Primal One. I know not your purpose.
Today's session concluded with Shiva Stuti and Hari Naam Sankirtan on the occasion of Shivratri festival.
The link for Rudrashtakam is given below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yGNUm4OOBWNtCJDvRiNWuL5LwIgd30vR/view?usp=drivesdk
Question & Answer session
Bajrang Lal Ji
Question:. What is the difference in Satyuga and Kalyuga? Why is Kalyuga considered inferior to Satyuga?
Answer:. Satyuga is the time when Dharma was praticed in all four ways which are:
austerity, cleanliness, truthfulness and compassion. In Kalyuga on an average, practice of Dharma in complete sense has got diluted.
Dr. Shipa M Prabhakar Ji
Question: In battle field of Kurukshetra, did the Devtas along with Arjuna and Sanjaya also could view the Vishwa Roop of Bhagawan?
Answer: Arjuna is able to view the Vishwa Roopa. Sanjaya is also able to view Bhagavan in Full form as a third person, as he was present while the discussion between Bhagavan and Arjuna was taking place. However, the Devtas overlooking the proceedings on the battle field were not able to view Him while he showed His full Form to Arjuna. They were not having divine vision. Later on in this chapter, infact Bhagavan said following to Arjuna:
सुदुर्दर्शमिदं रूपं दृष्टवानसि यन्मम |
देवा अप्यस्य रूपस्य नित्यं दर्शनकाङ्क्षिण: || 52||
Meaning, The Supreme Lord said: This form of Mine that you are seeing is exceedingly difficult to behold. Even the celestial gods are eager to see it. Neither by the study of the Vedas, nor by penance, charity, or fire sacrifices, can I be seen as you have seen Me.
Question: Does, all the downfalls / difficulties that come in life are due to Prarabdha (Destiny - Doctrine of Karma)?
Answer: No! not all are due to Prarabdha. The bad karmas that we end up doing while living, the effect of those also comes in the form of downfalls / difficulties. Say for example, we may end up facing stomach pain after over-eating.
There are two types of Prarabdha: Mild and Strong.
The Mild Prarabdha we can reduce or go away with by practicing good deeds, austerities and with blessing of the saints. However, the strong ones one has to go through. Example, a person who has achieved sainthood in current birth suffers from cancer.
So, all the difficulties that we face in life are not due to just the Prarabdha's. Some of those may be due to that, but majority of those are due to bad karmas that we have done in currently life.
Asha Ji
Question: Out of Mukti and Bhakti, I am attracted to Bhakti. Which one is best and what should I pursue?
Answer: Bharat ji said:
अर्थ न धर्म न काम रुचि, गति न चहउँ निर्वान ।
जनम जनम रति राम पद, यह वरदान न आन ।।
Bharat ji is saying "I don't desire arth, dharma, kaam or - moksha (nirvaan). A single bless--- loving ram-pad...is the desire for the births and births together, nothing else.
So, if a person is having such thoughts then he or she will be like Bharat. This is the highest thought that a person craves for Bhakti over Mukti.Pradnya Ji
Question: We should not do things which breaks heart of someone. Does this even apply to Bhakti? Will further elaborate this. Today have kept Shivratri's fast, but my family members want me to join them for dinner. What should I do?
Answer: By fasting, one is not breaking anyone's heart. Yes, if we force others to keep fast then maybe we are not doing the right thing.
But, one should not leave spiritual practices or principals going by what others are saying or what others are feeling.